Actual Freedom · Richard’s articles · visual edition

This Moment of Being Alive

How this page is built. The first six sections are a reader’s aid: diagrams and cards that lay out the method’s structure, each citing the paragraph (¶) or note it is drawn from. Below them the article appears in full and verbatim — all 41 paragraphs, the twelve banner quotations, and the video link — followed by all 34 notes in full (the source shows them as hover tool-tips). Click a numbered marker to open that note in place; click again to close it. Nothing from the source has been left out.

The method in one line

Asking the question is not the method. Consistently enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive is.

“Consistently enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive is what the actualism method is.” The article says this three times, in its third paragraph and in two of its banners. The question is the tool that gets one there; with practice it becomes wordless (notes 1, 3, 15).

The means

“How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?” — asked each moment again, until it becomes a non-verbal attitude, a wordless approach to life.

Paragraphs 2–3 · notes 3, 7, 29

=

The end

An ongoing enjoyment and appreciation of being here, right now — by feeling as happy and as harmless as is humanly possible.

Paragraphs 3, 4, 14 · note 4

Why the means and the end coincide. The method is “consciously and knowingly imitating life in the actual world” (paragraph 3). One deliberately imitates, affectively, what a pure consciousness experience (PCE) has already shown to be the case — so practising the method is already living what the method is for (notes 2, 4, 6, 24).

Only now is actual

The past did happen but is not actual now; the future will happen but is not actual now. Any change can only happen now, and if this moment is missed the next one is another chance.

Paragraph 1 · notes 1, 12, 22, 30

The “how” means the feeling

“Affectively, of course … ‘Am I bored?’, ‘Am I resentful?’, ‘Am I at ease?’ … What feeling is preventing the on-going experiencing of peace-on-earth?”

Note 29 · paragraph 15

Not enquiry, not mindfulness

An awareness-cum-attentiveness method, not a method of enquiry (note 18); an affective awareness, as distinct from buddhistic mindfulness, which needs cognitive engagement.

Paragraphs 14–15 · notes 3, 18, 33

Three families of feeling

Minimise both the “bad” and the “good” feelings; maximise the felicitous and innocuous ones.

“Bad” feelings — minimise

Malicious: spiteful feelings of intense hatred and resentment.
Sorrowful: melancholy feelings of yawning sadness and grief.

“Good” feelings — minimise

Loving: ardent feelings of profound affection and endearment.
Compassionate: empathetic feelings of deep sympathy and commiseration.

These are the antidotal feelings — the pacifiers of malice and sorrow — and just as much in the way (paragraph 14, notes 6, 26).

Felicitous / innocuous — maximise

Felicitous: happy and carefree; blithesome feelings of great delight and enjoyment.
Innocuous: harmless and congenial; gracious feelings of ingenuous tranquillity and affability.

Not docile: all the affective energy is channelled here, in conjunction with sensuosity (note 6).

Definitions quoted from note 6; the minimise/maximise framing from paragraphs 4 and 14 and note 4.

Neutral is not good enough

Feeling “neither too happy nor unhappy” is itself what stands in the way of enjoying this only moment — even brushing one’s teeth happens in “the most happy (and harmless) moment”.

Note 5

The spiritual mistake

Meditative traditions blow the “good” feelings up larger than life and subsume felicity under them: a conditional happiness, dependent on love and compassion being in the ascendant.

Notes 31, 32 · paragraphs 22–24

The baselines

Feeling good is the minimum standard. Once one has the knack, the bottom line is raised.

The loop — what one actually does

Feel the dip, get back to feeling good, then find out what happened — and carry a cue forward.

  1. 1Enjoying & appreciatingthis moment of being alive — feeling good, then happy & harmless, then excellent.
  2. 2Slightest diminishment feltThe flashing red light. Noticed affectively, by feeling it diminish — not by scanning. ¶10, ¶14 · notes 25–27
  3. 3Attentiveness activatesAutomatically. One has inadvertently wandered off the way. ¶4, ¶10
  4. 4First: get back to feeling goodIf below the bottom line, get to neutral first. Analysing while in the grip of feeling bad only spirals. Emotional/passional types especially. ¶9, ¶13 · notes 9, 23
  5. 5Then suss out — within half an hourWhere, when, how, why — and what for. “When did ‘I’ feel good last?” Trace back to then and come forward step by step. ¶7, ¶12 · notes 10, 23
  6. 6Pin-point the moment“He said that and I …” — usually some habitual reactive response. No need to go back past yesterday afternoon. ¶7, ¶8 · note 15
  7. 7See the sillinessof letting that — no matter what it was — take away this only moment of being alive. ¶8 · notes 12–14, 22, 28
  8. 8Feeling good again — with a cue“A pin-pointed cue to watch out for next time so as to not have that trigger off yet another bout of the same-old same-old.” ¶8
  9. 9Next time: nip it in the budNot suppressing, not ignoring — declining, with knowledge aforethought, to go down that well-trodden path again. Then back to 1. ¶8 · notes 16, 17

Success after success multiplies exponentially; more and more time is spent enjoying and appreciating, and the bottom line is up-levelled (¶2, ¶8). “One is thus soon back on track … and all because of everyday events.” (¶11)

The order matters

“What the identity … would do is first get back to feeling good and then, and only then, suss out where, when, how, why – and what for – feeling bad happened as experience had shown ‘him’ that it was counter-productive to do otherwise.” And always within half an hour, while the memory was fresh, “even if it meant sometimes falling back into feeling bad by doing so … Nothing, but nothing, can be swept under the carpet.”

Note 23 · paragraphs 12–13

Two temperaments

If you tend to be…then…
intellectual / abstractionalexamine the feeling and find its trigger while experiencing it
emotional / passionalget back to feeling good first, then figure out why

Note 9

Richard’s summary of the whole thing

“One felt good previously; one is not feeling good now; something happened to one to end that felicitous feeling; one finds out what happened; one sees how silly that is (no matter what it was); one is once more feeling good.”

Note 28

The tracing-back questions

What happened 6/7 hours ago which occasioned me to cease feeling good? Where was I? What was I doing / what was happening? Was I by myself / with company? — “go back (in memory) to when you were last feeling good and then heuristically come forward, step-by-step, until that moment.”

Note 10

Not a scan. One does not keep scanning the belly, chest, throat or face for feelings: “all it takes is to be aware of/ attentive to the slightest diminishment of whatever degree of felicity/innocuity one is currently experiencing” — with practice it is “unavoidably noticed”. Because the monitoring is affective, cognitive attention stays free for work, study or media (paragraph 14; notes 25, 27).

Why it works — what ‘I’ am made of

The article’s second half explains what the identity consists of, and why undoing it is the point.

‘I’ as ego, ‘me’ as soul

The thinker (“a little person inside one’s head”) and the feeler (“a little person in one’s heart”). Hurts feed ‘me’ as soul; praise feeds ‘I’ as ego. Not taking offence and not receiving praise “is a good start in undoing ‘me’”.

Paragraphs 18, 36

Beliefs

“A belief is an emotion-backed thought … passionate imagination.” Most are inherited — put in with love and fear, reward and punishment, the carrot and the stick. Examine each one, especially those that pass for ‘truths’.

Paragraph 19

The instinctual passions

Fear, aggression, nurture and desire: blind nature’s rough-and-ready “soft-ware” package, genetically umpteen hundreds of thousands of years old, felt as one’s ‘Original Face’. This ‘being’ is the passions — eliminate one and the other goes.

Paragraphs 26–28, 32

Only one person to change

“There is only one person in this whole wide world that one can change … myself.” Loneliness comes not from alienation from others but from not being what-I-am; being this body only, there is no void and no burden placed on others.

Paragraphs 16–17

Three ways of experiencing the one world

WorldWhoWhat it is
“Everyday reality”5.8 billion peopleIllusory, grim and glum — the human condition run by malice and sorrow.
“Greater Reality”0.0000001 of the populationDelusory, loving and compassionate — spiritual enlightenment: the ego dissolves, identity leaps from head to heart, ‘I am That’. Richard lived it for eleven years and calls it the ‘Tried and Failed’. The “seductive snare of Love and Beauty”.
The actual worldthis flesh-and-blood body onlyClean, clear and pure perfection that under-pins both; sensual delight; peace-on-earth already here. Reached by going beyond enlightenment into an actual freedom.

Paragraphs 22–24

Where it leads

From attention to apperception, and from a virtual freedom to an actual one.

Being ‘alive’ = exclusive attention→fascination→reflective contemplation→apperception→actual freedom

Apperception

“The mind’s awareness of itself” — not ‘I’ being aware of ‘me’. It is when ‘I’ cease thinking and thinking takes place of its own accord, and ‘me’ disappears with all the feelings. Evoked by paying exclusive attention to being fully alive right now: one is always here, it is already now — “one has arrived before one starts”.

Paragraphs 20–21 · note 33

Pure intent

“A palpable life-force; an actually occurring stream of benevolence and benignity” tapped into via the PCE. Once set in motion it is “an irresistible pull” and “an irreversible mutation in consciousness” — one has to be sure this is what one wants.

Paragraph 29

Naiveté, via sincerity

Feeling foolish about the inherited ‘wisdom of the real-world’ unlocks a dormant naiveté — the closest thing to actual innocence — and a naive enthusiasm to undo the conditioning. “The key to unlocking naiveté is sincerity, pure and simple.” Sincere, yes; serious, no way — a keen sense of humour is needed.

Paragraphs 25, 30 · notes 21, 27, 34

Self-immolation

“Psychological/ psychic self-immolation is the only sensible sacrifice that ‘I’ as ‘me’ being can make in order to reveal that which is actual.” ‘My’ demise turns out to have been as fictitious as ‘my’ presence; the entire affective faculty is deleted and one is “this thinking and reflective flesh-and-blood body simply brimming with sense organs”.

Paragraphs 33–37

Two-fold purpose

An immediate benefit (an ongoing affective felicity/innocuity — a virtual freedom, “way, way beyond normal human expectations”) and an ultimate benefaction (an enduring actual felicity/innocuity). A win-win either way.

Notes 2, 24

Caused vs uncaused happiness

A caused happiness has a beginning and an end; an uncaused one is perpetual and is “the default condition of the very fact of being alive as a flesh-and-blood body only”. Pleasant events are then a bonus, and unpleasant ones do not detract. The virtual freedom’s felicity is relatively unconditional.

Note 31

The article, in full

Every paragraph as published. Numbered markers open the notes in place.

Before applying the actualism method – the ongoing enjoyment and appreciation of this moment of being alive – it is essential for success to grasp the fact that this very moment which is happening now is your only moment of being alive1. The past, although it did happen, is not actual now. The future, though it will happen, is not actual now. Only now is actual. Yesterday’s happiness and harmlessness does not mean a thing if one is miserable and malicious now and a hoped-for happiness and harmlessness tomorrow is to but waste this moment of being alive in waiting. All one gets by waiting is more waiting. Thus any ‘change’ can only happen now. The jumping in point is always here; it is at this moment in time and this place in space. Thus, if one misses it this time around, hey presto, one has another chance immediately. Life is excellent at providing opportunities like this.

What ‘I’ did, all those years ago, was to devise a remarkably effective way to be able to enjoy and appreciate this moment of being alive each moment again (I know that methods are to be actively discouraged, in some people’s eyes, but this one worked). It does take some doing to start off with but, as success after success starts to multiply exponentially, it becomes progressively easier to enjoy and appreciate being here each moment again2. One begins by asking, each moment again, ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive’?3

Note: asking how one is experiencing this moment of being alive is not the actualism method; consistently enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive is what the actualism method is. And this is because the actualism method is all about consciously and knowingly imitating life in the actual world. Also, by virtue of proceeding in this manner the means to the end – an ongoing enjoyment and appreciation – are no different to the end itself.4

This perpetual enjoyment and appreciation is facilitated by feeling as happy and as harmless as is humanly possible.5 And this (affective) felicity/ innocuity is potently enabled via minimisation of both the ‘good’ and the ‘bad’ feelings6. An affective awareness is the key to maximising felicity and innocuity over all those alternate feelings inasmuch the slightest diminishment of enjoyment and appreciation automatically activates attentiveness.

Attentiveness to the cause of diminished enjoyment and appreciation restores felicity and innocuity. The habituation of actualistic awareness and attentiveness requires a persistent initialisation; persistent initialisation segues into a wordless approach, a non-verbal attitude towards life. It delivers the goods just here, right now, and not off into some indeterminate future. Plus the successes are repeatable – virtually on demand – and thus satisfy the ‘scientific method’.

So, ‘I’ asked myself, each moment again: ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive’?7 8

As one knows from the pure consciousness experiences (PCE’s), which are moments of perfection everybody has at some stage in their life, that it is possible to experience this moment in time and this place in space as perfection personified, ‘I’ set the minimum standard of experience for myself: feeling good. If ‘I’ am not feeling good then ‘I’ have something to look at to find out why9. What has happened, between the last time ‘I’ felt good and now? When did ‘I’ feel good last? Five minutes ago? Five hours ago? What happened to end those felicitous feelings? Ahh ... yes: ‘He said that and I ...’. Or: ‘She didn’t do this and I ...’. Or: ‘What I wanted was ...’. Or: ‘I didn’t do ...’. And so on and so on ... one does not have to trace back into one’s childhood ... usually no more than yesterday afternoon at the most10 (‘feeling good’ is an unambiguous term – it is a general sense of well-being – and if anyone wants to argue about what feeling good means ... then do not even bother trying to do this at all).11

Once the specific moment of ceasing to feel good is pin-pointed, and the silliness12 13 of having such an incident as that (no matter what it is) take away one’s enjoyment and appreciation of this only moment of being alive is seen for what it is14 – usually some habitual reactive response15 – one is once more feeling good ... but with a pin-pointed cue to watch out for next time so as to not have that trigger off yet another bout of the same-old same-old. This is called nipping it in the bud16 before it gets out of hand17 ... with application and diligence and patience and perseverance one soon gets the knack of this and more and more time is spent enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive18. And, of course, once one does get the knack of this19 20, one up-levels ‘feeling good’, as a bottom line each moment again, to ‘feeling happy and harmless’21 ... and after that to ‘feeling excellent’.

The more one enjoys and appreciates being just here right now – to the point of excellence being the norm – the greater the likelihood of a PCE happening ... a grim and/or glum person has no chance whatsoever of allowing the magical event, which indubitably shows where everyone has being going awry, to occur. Plus any analysing and/or psychologising and/or philosophising22 whilst one is in the grip of debilitating feelings usually does not achieve much (other than spiralling around and around in varying degrees of despair and despondency or whatever) anyway23.

The wide and wondrous path to an actual freedom from the human condition is marked by enjoyment and appreciation – the sheer delight of being as happy and harmless as is humanly possible whilst remaining a ‘self’24 – and the slightest diminishment of such felicity/ innocuity25 is a warning signal (a flashing red light26 as it were) that one has inadvertently wandered off the way.27

One is thus soon back on track ... and all because of everyday events.28

Thus, by asking ‘how am I experiencing this moment of being alive29’, the reward is immediate; by finding out what triggered off the loss of the felicitous feeling, one commences another period of enjoying and appreciating this moment of being alive. It is all about being here at this moment in time and this place in space ... and if you are not feeling happy and harmless you have no chance whatsoever of being here in this actual world (a glum and/or grumpy person locks themselves out of the perfect purity of this moment and place). And by having already established feeling good (a general sense of well-being) as the bottom line for moment-to-moment experiencing then if, or when, feeling happy and harmless fades there is that comfortable baseline from which to suss out where, when, how, why – and what for – the feeling of being happy and harmless ceased happening ... and all the while feeling good whilst going about it.

Furthermore if, or when, there is a sinking below the bottom line, and feeling bad (a general sense of ill-being) is the moment-to-moment experiencing then, rather than trying to suss out where, when, how, why – and what for – the general sense of well-being (feeling good) ceased occurring, it is far more useful to first get to a stage of being neutral, because, when in the feeling bad position, feeling good can appear to be so, so far away ... indeed, at times, feeling good can seem to be but a dream, a fancy, a chimera, a will-o’-the-wisp, from that position, and what’s the point anyway, that method didn’t work either (of course), it’s all stupid, life sucks, and ... and all the rest of those self-pitying, self-justifying, defeatist assertions. As the step from being neutral to feeling good is not such a big step then one is soon back on track again.

It is important to comprehend that the aim, the goal, of actualism practice is the enjoyment and appreciation of being alive right now30 – at this very moment of being alive and not indefinitely postponed off into some indeterminate future – via the minimisation of both the malicious/ sorrowful feelings (the ‘bad’ feelings) and their antidotal loving/ compassionate feelings (the ‘good’ feelings) in concert with the maximisation of the felicitous/ innocuous feelings, and how that (affective) enjoyment and appreciation is the very actualist awareness in action (as distinct from the buddhistic mindfulness, for instance, which requires cognitive engagement). What this means in effect is that, because one cannot help but be aware, each moment again, of even the slightest diminution of that experiential awareness (of that very enjoyment and appreciation of feeling as felicitous/ innocuous31 as is humanly possible32) via feeling it diminish, cognitive attentiveness can be freely applied to whatever one is engaged in doing, in one’s moment-to-moment daily life, be it earning a living, reading/ watching various media, studying for examinations, and so on, and so forth.

Put simply: for a feeling-being actualism’s awareness (in regards to how one is experiencing this moment of being alive) is an affective awareness.33

There is only one person in this whole wide world that one can change ... myself. This is the most important point to understand thoroughly, otherwise one endlessly tries to change the other ... and as there are billions of ‘others’ it would be a life-time task with still no success at the end. If one grasps that the way to peace-on-earth is by changing oneself – and oneself only – then all of one’s interactions with others will undergo a radical transformation. You set them free of your graceless demands ... your endless neediness born out of being alone in the world. The cause of sadness and loneliness is not, as is commonly believed, alienation from others. The single reason for being alone and lonely is from not being what-I-am. By not being this flesh and blood body just brimming with sensory organs, but being, instead, an identity within ‘I’ am doomed to perpetual loneliness and aloneness. ‘I’ am fated to ever pursue an elusive ‘Someone’ or ‘Something’ that will fill that aching void.

When I am what-I-am, there is no void. By being what I actually am – this body only – I have no need for others; hence I also have no need to place the burden upon them to fulfil that what was lacking. Not only do I free myself from that perpetual pursuit, but I also free others in my company from the task ‘I’ impose upon them. Being this sensual body is actual fulfilment, each moment again. Nevermore will I be needy, greedy and grasping. Nevermore will I plot and plan and manipulate others. Nevermore will I have to prostitute myself to others to assuage those main attributes of the identity within: being lost, lonely, frightened and cunning. Being what-I-am is to be free-flowing, spontaneous, delightful ... and it is fun, for one can never be hurt again.

One can free the heart and mind of hurts and slights ... and from succour and compliments as well. This is important, for the positive is as insidious as the negative when it comes to holding on to whatever from the past and the future. There must be an attainment of freedom from the past and the future in whatever form it takes, for ‘I’ am these hurts and compliments ... it is, in part, what ‘I’ am made up of. ‘I’ have a vested interest in taking offence, for it endorses the very nature of ‘me’ as soul. ‘I’ also thrive on receiving praise for it feeds what ‘I’ am as an ego. Both hurts and compliments give both ‘I’ and ‘me’ the nourishment ‘I’ need for ‘my’ survival. By not taking offence or receiving praise, ‘I’ have made a good start in undoing ‘me’. Thus the past and the future become less and less real as the sense of identity, as an enduring entity continuing over time, is dependent upon an emotion-backed memory and passionate imagination fuelling the fires of malice and sorrow. ‘I’ am a product of the emotional and passionate ‘real-world’ affective time-span.

Another part of what ‘I’ am made up of is beliefs: one’s sense of being a social identity is largely made up of beliefs ... beliefs as well as feelings. In fact, a belief is an emotion-backed thought ... passionate imagination. The vast majority of the beliefs that one carries are not invented by oneself; they were imbibed with the mother’s milk and added to thereupon up to the present day. They are inherited beliefs, put into the child with love and fear – reward and punishment – and added to as an adult out of awe and dread – the carrot and the stick – that power and authority engenders and thrives upon. It behoves one to examine each and every belief – especially those that pass for ‘truths’ – and watch them disappear out of one’s life forever. It is no wonder human beings are such a desperate lot. Beliefs and feelings are the bane of humankind ... they have been so instrumental in killing, maiming, torturing and otherwise causing such pain and suffering since the dawn of human history, that one wonders that they are given any credence at all these days. It is so liberating to be free of beliefs – of the action of believing itself – and feelings that I cannot recommend their elimination highly enough.

These are all feelings, this is not perfection personified yet ... but then again, feeling perfect for twenty three hours and fifty nine minutes a day (a virtual freedom) is way beyond normal human expectations anyway. Also, it is a very tricky way of both getting men fully into their feelings for the first time in their life and getting women to examine their feelings one by one instead of being run by a basketful of them all at once. One starts to feel ‘alive’. Being ‘alive’ is to be paying attention – exclusive attention – to this moment in time and this place in space. This attention becomes fascination ... and fascination leads to reflective contemplation. Then – and only then – apperception can occur. An apperceptive awareness can be evoked by paying exclusive attention to being fully alive right now. This moment is your only moment of being alive ... one is never alive at any other time than now. And, wherever you are, one is always here ... even if you start walking over to ‘there’, along the way to ‘there’ you are always here ... and when you arrive ‘there’, it too is here. Thus attention becomes a fascination with the fact that one is always here ... and it is already now. Fascination leads to reflective contemplation. As one is already here, and it is always now ... then one has arrived before one starts.

The potent combination of attention, fascination, reflection and contemplation produces apperception, which happens when the mind becomes aware of itself. Apperception is an awareness of consciousness. It is not ‘I’ being aware of ‘me’ being conscious; it is the mind’s awareness of itself. Apperception – a way of seeing that can be arrived at by reflective and fascinating contemplative thought – is when ‘I’ cease thinking and thinking takes place of its own accord ... and ‘me’ disappears along with all the feelings. Such a mind, being free of the thinker and the feeler – ‘I’ as ego and ‘me’ as soul – is capable of immense clarity and purity ... as a sensate body only, one is automatically benevolent and benign.

It is really important to understand about the soul (‘me’ at the core of ‘my’ being is ‘being’ itself) ... getting into feelings like this – ‘perfect’ feelings – leaves one in imminent danger of the seductive snare of Love and Beauty, and, conveniently ignoring their opposites, becoming enlightened, or at least illuminated. ‘Me’ – that intuition of ‘being’ that I call the soul – sugar coats itself with Love and Compassion and Beauty and Truth and swans along in a state of Blissful Euphoria. Thus one then goes off into some mystical State of Being in some metaphysical world and misses out on the clean and clear and pure perfection of this actual world. It is very, very difficult to get out of the enlightened state and go ‘beyond it’ into this actual world of the senses.

I found out for myself how difficult it was as I lived enlightenment for eleven years ... the same as the ‘Tried and True’ teachings that all the Saints and the Sages and the Seers, the Messiahs and the Masters, the Avatars and the Saviours and the Gurus and the God-men have been touting as being the cure-all for the ill of humankind for millennia. I found these solutions to be the ‘Tried and Failed’. I found that, in an altered state of consciousness such as spiritual enlightenment which results when the ego dissolves, the sense of identity does a quantum leap from the head to the heart. One realises oneself as being ‘Me’ at the core of ‘my’ being ... one becomes ‘pure being’ (usually capitalised as ‘Being’ upon Realisation). The resultant oceanic state of unitary perception – called by some choiceless awareness – creates the delusion that the illusion of ‘self’ is ended. There is an on-going experience of oneness and wholeness which expresses itself as: ‘I am everything and everything is Me’. For those who go all the way into this delusion, they realise that ‘I am The Self’ or ‘I am Buddha’ or ‘I am God’ or ‘I am That’ and so on.

It is possible to extinguish this identity – this ‘Me’ which is the second ‘I’ of Mr. Venkataraman Aiyer (aka Ramana) fame – and go beyond enlightenment into an actual freedom. One then lives in this actual world of sensual delight that under-pins both the illusory grim and glum ‘everyday reality’ experienced by 5.8 billion people and the delusory loving and compassionate ‘Greater Reality’ experienced by 0.0000001 of the population. Then one is both happy and harmless automatically.

You need to have a keen sense of humour. This business of becoming free is not – contrary to popular opinion – a serious business at all. Be totally sincere ... most definitely utterly sincere, as genuineness is essential.34 But serious ... no way. An actual freedom is all about having fun; about enjoying being here; about delighting in being alive. All that ‘being serious’ stuff actively works against peace-on-earth. One has to want to be here on this planet ... most people resent being here and wish to escape. This method will bring one into being more fully here than anyone has ever been before. If you do not want to be here, then forget it.

Your feeling of being – the real ‘me’ – is what is evidenced when one says: ‘But what about me, nobody loves me for me’! For a woman it is: ‘You only want me for my body ... and not for me’. For a man it is: ‘You only want me for my money ... and not for me’. For a child it is: ‘You only want to be my friend because of my toys (or sweets or whatever)’. This intuitive sense of ‘me’ – this being – arises out of the basic instinctual passions that blind nature endowed us all with as a rough and ready ‘soft-ware’ package to make a start in life. These passions – mainly fear and aggression and nurture and desire – appear as a rudimentary animal ‘self’. This is why it is felt to be one’s ‘Original Face’ – to use the Zen terminology – if one is open to ‘what is’.

Being born of the biologically inherited instincts genetically encoded in the germ cells of the spermatozoa and the ova, ‘I’ am – genetically – umpteen hundreds of thousands of years old ... ‘my’ origins are lost in the mists of pre-history. ‘I’ am so anciently old that ‘I’ may well have always existed ... carried along on the reproductive cell-line, over countless millennia, from generation to generation. And ‘I’ am thus passed on into an inconceivably open-ended and hereditably transmissible future. Biologically all sentient beings are – very fundamentally only – identical. The survival instincts (fear and aggression and nurture and desire in some form or another) are more or less common to all creatures and have been essential to get sentient life to this point in the earth’s history ... it is what got this body and that body and every body here in the first place. All peoples living today are the end-point of myriads of survivors passing on their genes ... every body is the product of the ‘success story’ of fear and aggression and nurture and desire.

Is one really going to abandon that which produced one ... that which (apparently) keeps one alive?

‘I’ am not alone in this endeavour because ‘I’ can tap into the purity and perfection of the infinitude of this physical universe with a pure intent born out of the PCE that one has during a peak experience. Pure intent is a palpable life-force; an actually occurring stream of benevolence and  benignity that originates in the vast and utter stillness that is the essential character of the universe itself. Once set in motion, it is no longer a matter of choice: it is an irresistible pull. It is the adventure of a lifetime to embark upon a voyage of exploration and discovery; to not only seek but to find. And once found, it is here for the term of one’s natural life ... it is an irreversible mutation in consciousness. Once launched it is impossible to turn back and resume one’s normal life ... one has to be absolutely sure that this is what one truly wants.

One simply needs to look at the physical world and just know that this enormous construct called the universe is not ‘set up’ for us humans to be forever forlorn and feisty in with only scant moments of reprieve. ‘I’ can realise here and now that it is not and can never be some ‘sick cosmic joke’ that humans all have to endure and ‘make the best of’. ‘I’ will feel foolish that ‘I’ have believed for all these years that the ‘wisdom of the real-world’ that ‘I’ have inherited – the world that ‘I’ was born into – is set in stone. This foolish feeling allows ‘me’ to get in touch with ‘my’ dormant naiveté, which is the closest thing one has that resembles actual innocence, and activate it with a naive enthusiasm to undo all the conditioning and brainwashing that ‘I’ have been subject to. When ‘I’ look into myself and at all the people around and see the sorrow and malice in every human being, ‘I’ can not stop. ‘I’ know that ‘I’ have just devoted myself to the task of setting ‘myself’ and ‘humanity’ free ... ‘I’ willingly dedicate my life to this most worthy cause. It is so delicious to devote oneself to something whole-heartedly – the ‘boots and all’ approach!

‘I’ become obsessed with changing ‘myself’ fundamentally, radically, completely and utterly.

This entails finding the source of ‘myself’ ... and ‘I’ discover that a ‘being’ arises out of the instinctual passions that blind nature endows all sentient beings with at birth. This ‘being’ – the rudimentary self – is the root cause of all the malice and sorrow that besets humankind, and to eliminate malice and sorrow ‘I’ have to eliminate the fear and aggression and nurture and desire that this ‘being’ is made up of ... the instinctual passions. But as this ‘being’ is the instinctual passions – there is no differentiation betwixt the two – then the elimination of one is the elimination of the other. In fact, with the elimination of these passions, ‘I’ cease to exist as ‘me’, a ‘being’ in the body, period.

Psychological/ psychic self-immolation is the only sensible sacrifice that ‘I’ as ‘me’ being can make in order to reveal that which is actual. And that which is actual is a clear and clean and pure perfection. Life is bursting with meaning when ‘I’/‘me’ are no longer present to mess things up. ‘I’/‘me’ stand in the way of the clarity and purity of the clean perfection of the actual being apparent. ‘My’ very presence prohibits this ever-present perfection being evident. ‘I’ as ‘me’ being prevents the very purity of life, that ‘I’ am searching for, from coming into plain view. With ‘my’ demise, this ever-fresh perfection is now manifest. Peace-on-earth was here in this actual world all the time.

The day finally dawns where the definitive moment of being here, right now, conclusively arrives; something irrevocable takes place and every thing and every body and every event is different, somehow, although the same physically; something immutable occurs and every thing and every body and every event is all-of-a-sudden undeniably actual, in and of itself, as a fact; something irreversible happens and an immaculate perfection and a pristine purity permeates every thing and every body and every event; something has changed forever, although it is as if nothing has happened, except that the entire world is a magical fairytale-like playground full of incredible gladness and a delight which is never-ending.

‘My’ demise was as fictitious as ‘my’ apparent presence. I have always been here, I realise, it was that ‘I’ only imagined that ‘I’ existed. It was all an emotional play in a fertile imagination ... which was, however, fuelled by an actual hormonal substance triggered off from within the brain-stem because of the instinctual passions bestowed by blind nature. Thus the psyche – the entire affective faculty born of the instincts itself – is wiped out forever and one is finally what one actually is: this thinking and reflective flesh-and-blood body simply brimming with sense organs, delighting in this very sensual world of actual experience.

Thus the search for meaning amidst the debris of the much-vaunted human hopes and dreams and schemes comes to its timely end. With the end of both ‘I’ and ‘me’, the distance or separation between both ‘I’ and ‘me’ and the sense organs – and thus the external world – disappears. To be living as the senses is to live a clean and clear and pure awareness – apperception – a pure consciousness experience of the world as-it-is. Because there is no ‘I’ as a thinker (a little person inside one’s head) or a ‘me’ as a feeler (a little person in one’s heart) – to have sensations happen to them, one is the sensations. The entire affective faculty vanishes ... blind nature’s software package of instinctual passions is deleted.

Then there is nothing except the series of sensations which happen ... not happening to an ‘I’ or a ‘me’ but just happening ... moment by moment ... one after another. To live life as these sensations, as distinct from having them, engenders the most astonishing sense of freedom and magic. It is all so peaceful, in this actual world; one is living in peace and tranquillity; a meaningful peace and tranquillity. Life is intrinsically purposeful, the reason for existence lies openly all around. It never goes away – nor has it ever been away – it was just that ‘I’/‘me’ was standing in the way of the meaning of life being apparent.  The answer to everything that has puzzled humankind for all of human history is readily elucidated when one is actually free.

The ‘Mystery of Life’ has been penetrated and laid open for all those with the eyes to see.

Actualism Method & Virtual Freedom Except

Actualism Method & Virtual Freedom Discussion (video)

This video is licensed under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

The notes, in full

All 34 of Richard’s article notes, in order, with their sources.

  1. 1

    The only Moment I’m ever Alive

    RICK: Richard, in regards to the actualist method, is ‘... the only moment I’m ever alive’ phrase helpful after asking the ‘how am I experiencing ...’ question? Are there benefits to saying that statement along with the question? Or is ‘how am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ sufficient enough to become actually free?

    RICHARD: The reason why I draw attention to the fact that this moment is the only moment one is ever alive when responding to queries about the actualism method – asking oneself, each moment again, how one is experiencing this moment of being alive (the only moment one is ever alive) until it becomes a non-verbal attitude/ a wordless approach to life – is so as to provide for an undivided attention or exclusive focus upon what is currently occurring ... this moment being the very place, so to speak, where not only everything happens but where radical change can, and does, occur.

    If there be not this salient comprehension (that this moment is the only moment one is ever alive) then tacking that phrase onto the actualism question – until it too becomes a non-verbal attitude/ a wordless approach to life – would, presumably, be helpful in gaining that understanding. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, Rick, 14 December 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  2. 2

    The Actualism Method is all about Imitating Life in the Actual World

    RICK: Another thing: I am getting somewhat tired of applying your method and not experiencing a pure consciousness experience.
    RICHARD: The purpose of applying the method, which the identity inhabiting this flesh and blood body all those years ago devised, is two-fold – to be of an immediate benefit (an ongoing affective felicity/ innocuity) and an ultimate benefaction (an enduring actual felicity/ innocuity) – and is thus a win-win situation inasmuch as in the meanwhile, if the ultimate be yet to come about, a virtual freedom is way, way beyond normal human expectations.

    RICK: It has been about a year now that I’ve been diligently applying the method and have not been able to remember nor experience one yet.
    RICHARD: Maybe, just maybe, the activation of the amazement, the marvelling, and the wonderment, already mentioned above might be in order? And I only mention this because sensuosity is an integral part of the process of being as happy and as harmless as is humanly possible.

    RICK: I feel more at ease with life, yes.
    RICHARD: I have just now re-read our only other exchange (five months ago) wherein, regarding the application of the actualism method, you reported [quote] ‘it’s having some success in that it’s helping me cope’ [endquote] and what immediately springs to mind is that [quote] ‘feeling more at ease with life’ [endquote] is streets ahead of merely being helped to cope.

    And I am not just ‘talking you up’ as experience has shown that, while peoples are quite ready to self-criticise and bemoan their fate, they are less likely to as readily self-congratulate and applaud their progression out of same.

    Try patting yourself on the back for each and every success ... as a boost to confidence a well-deserved accolade is a tonic like no other.

    RICK: But I’m still feeling lost and I feel a well deserved PCE is what I need to put some focus, clarity and motivation in ridding the ‘parasitical entity inhabiting this flesh and blood body’. What to do?
    RICHARD: Again, and especially as you mention feeling lost, come to your senses – literally – as much as is possible so as to better enjoy and appreciate being alive on this verdant and azure planet, which is simply floating/ hanging effortlessly in infinite space at this moment in eternal time, by cultivating the awareness that everything and everybody is coming from nowhere and nowhen and is, similarly, going nowhere and nowhen as everything and everybody only ever actually exists right now.

    Put succinctly: there is nowhere/ nowhen else to be ... this is it! source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, Rick, 30 September 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  3. 3

    The Actualism Method Is an Awareness-Cum-Attentiveness Method

    [Richard]: ‘(...) It is a question, not a phrase to be memorised and repeated slogan-like (or as if chanting a mantra for instance), and it soon becomes a non-verbal attitude to life ... a wordless approach each moment again whereupon one cannot be anything else but [affectively] aware of one’s every instinctual impulse/affective feeling, and thus self-centred thought, as it is happening.

    [...] ‘The words ‘how am I experiencing this moment of being alive’ simply refer the make-up of the awareness-cum-attentiveness being applied ... as distinct from, say, the buddhistic ‘mindfulness’ (which is another ball-game entirely).

    In other words the focus is upon how the identity in toto is standing in the way of the already always existing peace-on-earth being apparent just here right now.
    source Actual Freedom List, No. 68c, 31 May 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  4. 4

    The Actualism Method is all about Imitating Life in the Actual World

    RESPONDENT: It’s interesting that in practicing Actualism, we need to be in touch with our emotions enough to not be detached, but not so much in touch with them that we get dissociated as in enlightenment.

    RICHARD: For the sake of clarity in communication I would stress that the actualism method sits firmly upon the minimisation of both the ‘good’ and ‘bad’ feelings and the optimisation of the felicitous/ innocuous feelings ... and merely being in touch with felicity will not do the trick. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 50, 30 September 2003). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  5. 5

    Feeling as Happy and as Harmless as is Humanly Possible

    RESPONDENT: What about when I feel neither too happy nor unhappy?
    RICHARD: Then that is what is preventing one’s enjoyment and appreciation of this only moment of being alive ... and it is rather silly, is it not, to waste this only moment one is ever alive by feeling neither too happy nor unhappy?

    RESPONDENT: What cause is there for those neutral moments?
    RICHARD: Once one realises that those very ‘neutral moments’ are standing in the way of enjoying and appreciating this, the only moment one is ever alive, one will have the motivation to soon find the cause so as to not have them happen ... preferably ever again.

    RESPONDENT: Like, brushing my teeth, for example, it’s not the most happy, but no pain either.
    RICHARD: Yet the moment in which the teeth-brushing happens is the most happy (and harmless) moment ... which felicity could be experienced if it be not for the feeling of neutrality standing in the way of such exquisite existence being experienced, that is. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 83, 5 February 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  6. 6

    ‘Feeling Good’ Is an Unambiguous Term

    [Respondent]: Could you list some examples of what you’d classify as ‘good’ and ‘bad’ feelings and what you’d classify as felicitous/innocuous feelings so I could keep an eye out for them.

    [Richard]: As a broad generalisation: the ‘good’ feelings are those that are of a loving (ardent feelings of profound affection and endearment) and a compassionate (empathetic feelings of deep sympathy and commiseration) nature; the ‘bad’ feelings are those that are of a malicious (spiteful feelings of intense hatred and resentment) and a sorrowful (melancholy feelings of yawning sadness and grief) nature; the felicitous feelings are those that are of a happy and carefree (blithesome feelings of great delight and enjoyment) nature; the innocuous feelings are those that are of a harmless and congenial (gracious feelings of ingenuous tranquillity and affability) nature.

    The following may be of particular interest:

    • [Richard]: ‘The felicitous/innocuous feelings are in no way docile, lack-lustre affections ... in conjunction with sensuosity they make for an extremely forceful/potent combination as, with all of the affective energy channelled into being as happy and harmless as is humanly possible (and no longer being frittered away on love and compassion/malice and sorrow), the full effect of ‘me’ at the core of ‘my’ being – which is ‘being’ itself – is dynamically enabled for one purpose and one purpose alone. (...) The actualism method is not about undermining the passions ... on the contrary, it is about directing all of that affective energy into being the felicitous/innocuous feelings (that is, ‘me’ at the core of ‘my’ being, which is ‘being’ itself) in order to effect a deliberate imitation of the actual, as evidenced in a PCE [a pure consciousness experience], so as to feel as happy and as harmless (as free of malice and sorrow) as is humanly possibly whilst remaining a ‘self’.

    Such imitative felicity/innocuity, in conjunction with sensuosity, readily evokes amazement, marvel, and delight – a state of wide-eyed wonder best expressed by the word naiveté (the nearest a ‘self’ can come to innocence whilst being a ‘self’) – and which allows the overarching benignity and benevolence inherent to the infinitude, which this infinite and eternal and perpetual universe actually is, to operate more and more freely. This intrinsic benignity and benevolence, which has nothing to do with the imitative affective happiness and harmlessness, will do the rest.

    All that was required was ‘my’ cheerful, and thus willing, concurrence’. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 60f, 29 Sep 2005).

    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, Rick-a, 22 Jun 2006). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  7. 7

    How am I Experiencing This Moment of Being Alive?

    [Respondent]: What is the answer to the haietmoba?

    [Richard]: In short ... it is an experiential answer.

    To explain: the whole point of asking oneself, each moment again until it becomes a non-verbal attitude or a wordless approach to life, how one is experiencing this moment of being alive (the only moment one is ever alive) is to experientially ascertain just exactly what is the way or manner in which one is personally participating in the events which are occurring at this particular moment that one is alive ... after all, irregardless of whether one takes the back seat or not, we are all busy doing this business called being alive by the very fact of being a sentient creature known as a human being (with all that inheres in being and doing that).

    Thus the answer to your query – what the answer is to asking how one is experiencing this moment of being alive – is dependent upon, on each occasion again, just exactly what the way or manner it is that one is personally participating in the occurrences which are currently happening.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 71, 9 Jul 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  8. 8

    Darring to Care Altruistically

    RESPONDENT: The how is an interesting question but doesn’t how sort of put off the pressing of the button for another day?

    RICHARD: No ... given that the ‘how’ is daring to care altruistically about all the misery and mayhem which epitomises the human condition (which sets in motion the corresponding altruistic process that will ensure peace-on-earth, in this lifetime, as this flesh and blood body) such a ‘pressing of the button’ happens in the present-time.
    Otherwise one is *not* daring to care altruistically about all the misery and mayhem that epitomises the human condition.

    RESPONDENT: With the how, doesn’t a way evolve with some illusion or carrot chasing?

    RICHARD: No ... given that the ‘way’ is the corresponding altruistic process that will ensure peace-on-earth, in this lifetime as this flesh and blood body, no illusion or carrot-chasing evolves.
    Otherwise one has *not* dared to care altruistically about all the misery and mayhem that epitomises the human condition.

    RESPONDENT: The self is always trying for a how, a way, isn’t it?

    RICHARD: Not for the one who dares to care altruistically about all the misery and mayhem that epitomises the human condition ... such a person has already embarked upon the ‘way’ to an actual freedom from the human condition. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 53e, 27 April 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  9. 9

    ‘I’ have something to look at to find out why

    [Respondent]: (...) How is the method best done – should I examine the feeling and find its trigger while experiencing it, in order to get back to feeling good?

    [Richard]: If you have a tendency towards being an intellectual/ abstractional-type person then ... yes.

    [Respondent]: Or should I get back to feeling good and then figure out why I last felt less-than-good?

    [Richard]: If you have a tendency towards being an emotional/ passional-type person then ... yes. source
    (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 110b, 21 June 2006). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  10. 10

    One Does Not Have to Trace Back into One’s Childhood

    [Respondent]: Since I last felt good (6/7 hours ago), I have been trying to re-commence feeling good with no success.

    [Richard]: Okay, it is all as simple as this ... trace back by asking yourself such questions as: what happened 6/7 hours ago which occasioned me to cease feeling good? Where was I, back then? What was I doing/what was happening? Was I by myself/ was I with company? Once you start to recall where you were/what you were doing/what was happening/ who was there, and so on, just prior to ceasing to feel good you will find it a lot easier to pin-point the precise moment when those felicitous/innocuous feelings came to an end ... and, thus, just what it was which did that. In short: go back (in memory) to when you were last feeling good and then come forward, step-by-step, until that moment.

    [...] [Respondent]: How do I get back to feeling good?

    [Richard]: Quite simply ... by actively tracing back to when you last felt good (a general sense of well-being) through literally asking yourself such questions as: what happened 6/7 hours ago which occasioned me to cease feeling good? Where was I, back then? What was I doing/what was happening? Was I by myself/was I with company?

    Once you actually start to recall where you were/what you were doing/what was happening/who was there, and so on, just prior to ceasing to feel good you will find it a lot easier to pin-point the precise moment when those felicitous/innocuous feelings came to an end ... and, thus, just what it was which really did that.

    In short: consciously go back (in memory) to when you were last feeling good and then heuristically come forward (in memory), step-by-step, until that moment.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 110, 28 Mar 2006). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  11. 11

    ‘Feeling Good’ is an unambiguous Term

    Richard: Here it is, again, at its most basic: it is nice to feel good (whereas feeling bad is not nice).

    Many years ago, now, I was sitting out to the side of my cave-site on a steep hillside, in the rain-forested hinterland to the north-west of where my dwelling is currently located, conversing with someone known to me from my art-college days – we had met-up on the Indian sub-continent a year or so before and had travelled together up into the foothills of the Himalayas (staying for a few months on a ridge about ten kilometres above Almora, Uttarakhand, known as Kasar Devi after a 2nd Century temple situated there) where many a deep and meaningful discussion had taken place (about life, the cosmos, and what it was to be spiritually enlightened/ mystically awakened, as he had been a spiritual-seeker of many years standing) with some profound experiences happening for him, thereof, including a three-day peak experience which settled into an unmistakable ASC thereafter – when all-of-a-sudden he stopped mid-sentence and, looking at me with head tilted quizzically, asked: ‘Why would you want to feel good all the time’?

    Quite frankly, I sat there in near-astonishment, for a moment, before answering with what probably sounded to him somewhat tautologous: ‘Because it feels good to feel good’, and then adding, upon seeing him looking askance as if at listening to a simpleton, ‘whereas feeling bad doesn’t feel good, it feels bad; feeling good doesn’t feel bad, it feels good’. And, furthermore, for good measure: ‘It really is as simple as that ... and, as feeling good is a nice feeling to be feeling, all of the time, why would you want to feel bad instead’?

    To this very day, thirty years hence, it is still somewhat astounding that there be so many who do not grasp this simple fact which the naïve boy from the farm had embraced whole-heartedly. source (Richard, List D, No. 4b, 4 July 2015). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  12. 12

    The Silliness of Feeling Bad

    [Respondent]: I am not able to see the silliness of feeling bad ...

    [Richard]: Do you comprehend that, although the past was actual when it was happening, it is not actual now and that, although the future will be actual when it does happen, it is not actual now ... that only this moment is actual?

    If so, do you further comprehend that anytime you felt good/will feel good does not mean a thing if you are not feeling good now ... that a remembered occasion/an anticipated occasion pales into insignificance if you are feeling bad now?

    Furthermore, do you understand that to be living this moment – the only moment you are ever alive – by feeling bad is to be frittering away a vital opportunity to be fully alive ... to totally enjoy and appreciate being what you indubitably are (a sensate creature) whilst you are here on this planet?

    If so, is it not silly to waste this only moment you are ever alive by feeling bad ... when you could be feeling good?
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 71, 15 Jul 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  13. 13

    The Silliness is Seen for What it is

    [Respondent]: How does the mere seeing how silly it is make us happy once again?

    [Richard]: Because nothing, absolutely nothing, is worth getting malicious or miserable about (let alone compensatingly loving and compassionate) when the realisation that this moment is the only one there ever is becomes the actuality it already always is.
    source (Richard, List D, No. 11, 24 Nov 2009). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  14. 14

    The Silliness of Having Such an Incident as that Take Away One’s Enjoyment

    [Respondent]: Richard, how long do you think will it take before it becomes automatic to have the question running?

    [Richard]: About as long as it takes to realise that feeling anything other than happy and harmless sucks ... and sucks big-time at that.

    ... [Respondent]: How soon will the rewards can be reaped by the method (in getting rid of the ‘me’) so that the momentum can be acquired by the success rather than the veracity/power of your words?

    [Richard]: About as soon as it takes to realise that feeling anything other than happy and harmless sucks ... and sucks big-time at that.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 71, 9 Jun 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  15. 15

    Usually Some Habitual Reactive Response

    [Respondent]: ... feeling bad seems to be the driving force for doing various things like laundry, which I am not interested in – and the only way feeling bad goes away is by doing it ... not by seeing the silliness of it ... am I missing something here?

    [Richard]: Maybe an example will provide the clue: back in 1981, in the early days of starting on the wide and wondrous path to an actual freedom from the human condition, I was standing in the kitchen of my ex-farmhouse, situated on a couple of acres of land in a remote countryside location, washing the breakfast dishes; I was not interested in washing the dishes/I had never been interested in washing the dishes; I did not like washing the dishes/I had never liked washing the dishes; washing the dishes was an uninteresting chore, an unlikeable task, that just had to be done (otherwise I would not be doing it/would never had done it/would never do it) ... and all the while the early-morning sun was streaming in through the large glass windows, in the eastern wall to my front, beckoning me, enticing me to hurry-up and get the uninteresting and unlikeable job over and done with so that I could scamper outside and get stuck into doing the interesting things I really liked doing/wanted to do.

    Howsoever, the tool for facilitating the actualism method – asking oneself, each moment again, how one is experiencing this moment of being alive (the only moment one is ever alive) – had by now become a non-verbal approach to life, a wordless attitude towards being alive, and all-of-a-sudden, whilst standing there with my hands in the sink being anywhere but here, at anytime but now, it was a delight and a joy to be doing exactly what it was I was already doing anyway ... standing in the golden sunlight with hands immersed in delicious, tingling-to-the-touch, hot soapy water.

    I find myself looking at what the hands are feeling (the hot soapy water) and become aware I have never seen hot soapy water before – have never really seen hot soapy water before – and become fascinated with the actuality of what is happening: it is as if the hands know what to do without any input from me; they are reaching for a plate, they are applying the scourer appropriately, they are turning the plate over, they are applying the scourer appropriately, they are lifting the cleaned plate out of the washing sink; they are dipping it into the rinsing sink; they are placing it in the rack to drip ... and all this while they are feeling the delicious tingling sensation of hot soapy water as it strips-away the grease and other detritus.

    I am not required at all; I am a supernumerary; I am redundant; I can retire, fold in my hand, pack in the game, depart, disappear, dissolve, disintegrate, vamoose, vanish, die – whatever – and life would manage quite well, thank you, without me ... a whole lot better, in fact, as I am holding up the works from functioning smoothly.

    ‘I’ was not needed ... ‘my’ services were no longer required.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 71, 15 Jul 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  16. 16

    Nipping in the Bud

    The phrase ‘nipping them in the bud’ is not to be confused with either suppression/ repression or ignoring/ avoiding ... it is to be consciously and deliberatively – with knowledge aforethought – declining oh-so-sensibly to futilely go down that well-trodden path to nowhere fruitful yet again. source (Richard, AFT ‘Frequently Asked Questions’ — “The Difference between ‘Nipping in the Bud’ and Suppressing a Feeling?”). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  17. 17

    Take This to Be a General ‘Rule of Thumb’

    I write of the identity inhabiting this flesh-and-blood body all those years ago neither suppressing nor expressing either the ‘good’ or the ‘bad’ feelings – and provide a personal example of (full-blown) anger being thusly put into a bind, such as to occasion the third alternative to magically hove into view, whereafter (full-blown) anger played no active part in ‘his’ life ever again – and more than a few take this to be a general ‘rule of thumb’ applicable to all the affective feelings inclusive of the felicitous and innocuous affections (an unendorsed/ unsanctioned unilateral pursuit I have previously referred to, when talking face-to-face with some of those so inclined, as a suave-and-sophisticated “faux-actualism practice” being studiously observed, for its urbane effect, by its resultant “buttoned-down pseudo-actualist” practician).

    Moreover, this blanket application of a particular instance is further taken as having fungibility with the ‘nipping-it-in-the-bud’ way of consciously and deliberatively – with knowledge aforethought – declining oh-so-sensibly to futilely go down a well-trodden path to nowhere fruitful yet again (due to there being no rational justification for keeping on feeling the same cul-de-sac feelings over and again ad nauseam) when, for example, the merest hint of a quite mild ‘sweet sorrow’ or ‘gentle melancholy’ first starts its subtly enticing and tempting tug-tugging on the heart-strings (along with the mesmeric allure of a deeply-felt solace/ succour and/or consolation/ comfort waiting to be obtained therein and their ever-unfulfillable ‘promise’ of resolution thereby). source (Richard, List d, Martin, 6 March 2016). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  18. 18

    The Actualism Method is an Awareness-Cum-Attentiveness Method

    [Richard]: ‘The actualism method is an awareness-cum-attentiveness method – not a method of enquiry – inasmuch one is aware of/ attentive as to how one is experiencing this moment of being alive (the only moment one is ever alive) so that the slightest deviation from the wide and wondrous path to an actual freedom from the human condition can be attended to forthwith ... thus enabling one to live as peacefully and harmoniously (as happily and harmlessly) as is humanly possible each moment again.

    Any and all enquiry has far more chance of success when one is back on track again.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 68d, 10 Oct 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  19. 19

    If I recognise that I am the feeling

    RESPONDENT: *‘It has taken me a hell of a long time to understand the difference between having feelings and being those feelings. Because I have not clearly understood this, I’ve never quite got the hang of paying attention to feelings without praise or blame, and without notions of innocence and culpability, right and wrong, etc getting in the way.

    This makes things very interesting. The moment I regard my ‘self’ as ‘having’ a feeling, I’m split down the middle and there’s a secondary reaction on the part of the social identity (an urge to “do something” about the feeling, which in turn evokes more feelings, and so on).Conversely, if I recognise that I am the feeling, it most often dissolves into thin air – and usually pretty quickly too.

    This is great. It’s especially helpful with regard to anger and frustration which have been two of my biggest hurdles to date. Previously, when I caught myself being angry, annoyed or frustrated, identifying and paying attention to this feeling would NOT cause it to disappear. On the contrary, the feeling and the awareness of myself as ‘having’ it would sometimes become like a microphone and amplifier locked into a screaming feedback loop.

    I’m really pleased that this is no longer happening. It seems almost too easy’.* [emphasis in original]. (Thursday 28/10/2004 6:55 PM AEST)

    RICHARD: And again there is a reference to how ‘almost too easy’ actualism is. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 60g, 30 October 2005a). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  20. 20

    Affectively feel that ‘I’ am my feelings

    VINEETO to Kuba: What happens if you allow the feelings associated with this “most central part of my persona” to come closer, and closer, so intimately close that you affectively feel that ‘I’ am my feelings [of this original image] and my feelings are ‘me’? Not as a cognitive analysis but as an existential affective experience? source (Actualism, Actualvineeto, Kuba15, 9 September 2026).

    CLAUDIU: Wonderful things happen. It’s quite a short path from the fear/ dread/ reluctance/ reticence to do so/ putting it off/ avoiding it/ etc., to the actually usually quite mild discomfort whilst doing so, to the “what was the fuss all really about?”, to forgetting ever had that issue in the first place haha. source (see: Actualism, Actualvineeto, Claudiu7, 10 September 2026). (links open in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  21. 21

    Happy and Harmless

    [Respondent]: If I could move on to the question of being ‘Happy and Harmless’; I guess that the main difficulty I am having is in understanding that one can be happy without ‘feeling’ happy but I will persevere with the actual freedom web site, which I am finding fascinating, until this becomes clear to me.

    [Richard]: Okay ... it may be worthwhile bearing in mind that it is impossible to be happy (be happy as in being carefree), as distinct from feeling happy, without being harmless (being harmless as in being innocuous), as distinct from feeling harmless, and to be happy and harmless is to be unable to induce suffering – etymologically the word ‘harmless’ (harm + less) comes from the Old Norse ‘harmr’ (meaning grief, sorrow) – either in oneself or another.

    Thus the means of comprehending the distinction lies in understanding the nature of innocence – something entirely new to human experience – and the nearest one can come to being innocent whilst being an identity is to be naïve (not to be confused with being gullible).

    And the key to naïveté (usually locked away in childhood) is sincerity.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 62, 26 Mar 2004). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  22. 22

    Any Analysing and/or Psychologising ... Does Not Achieve Much

    [Respondent]: Suppose I feel bad for some reason. Isn’t the traditional way to fix the situation as opposed to seeing how silly it is?

    [Richard]: The traditional way may take many forms (such as philosophising, psychologising, analysing, for instance) but never something so simple as seeing how silly it is, as opposed to sensible, to spend the only moment of ever actually being alive – this moment – feeling miserable or malicious (or antidotally loving and compassionate) when it is so easy to be happy and harmless.

    The past, although it was actual whilst it was happening, is not actual now; the future, although it will be actual when it is happening, is not actual now; only this moment is actual.

    The exquisite attention engendered, by the exclusive focus upon how this moment is being experienced, will reveal via felicitous/innocuous and thus naïve sensuosity that this moment has no duration in actuality – it is never not this moment – which means that time, being thus eternal, does not move.

    There is a vast stillness here in this actual world (the sensate world).

    [...] To explain: just as space is an arena for objects to exist in so too is time an arena (so to speak) for events to occur; just as the arena called space does not move neither does the arena (so too speak) called time move, either.

    A clock (originally a primitive sundial) measures the rate of rotation of planet earth on its axis; a calendar measures the rate of its orbit around its star (the sun); neither is a measure of time as time eternally stands still.

    Is it not silly to be malicious/miserable (or counteractively loving/ compassionate) where felicity/ innocuity is eternally available?

    Is it not sensible to be felicitous/innocuous instead?
    source (Richard, List D, No. 11, 24 Nov 2009). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  23. 23

    Analysing and/or Psychologising ... Does Not Achieve Much

    [Richard]: What the identity inhabiting this flesh and blood body all those years ago would do is first get back to feeling good and then, and only then, suss out where, when, how, why – and what for – feeling bad happened as experience had shown ‘him’ that it was counter-productive to do otherwise.

    What ‘he’ always did however, as it was often tempting to just get on with life then, was to examine what it was all about within half-an-hour of getting back to feeling good (while the memory was still fresh) even if it meant sometimes falling back into feeling bad by doing so ... else it would crop up again sooner or later.

    Nothing, but nothing, can be swept under the carpet.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 68c, 31 May 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  24. 24

    ... Whilst Remaining A ‘Self’

    [Respondent]: So, if I got it right, you’re saying getting back to feeling good, then excellent, which becoming a more stable condition allows for the possibility of the ‘big event’ to happen and investigating beliefs is only necessary insofar as that works toward that ultimate goal?

    [Richard]: Aye ... the purpose of applying the method, which the identity inhabiting this flesh and blood body all those years ago both devised and put into full effect, is two-fold – to be of an immediate benefit (an ongoing affective felicity/innocuity) and an ultimate benefaction (an enduring actual felicity/innocuity) – and is thus a win-win situation inasmuch as in the meanwhile, if the ultimate be yet to come about, a virtual freedom is way, way beyond normal human expectations.

    I cannot stress enough how, with a virtual freedom being more or less the norm worldwide, global amity and equity would be an on-going state of affairs’. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 68d, 17 October 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  25. 25

    The Slightest Diminishment of Such Felicity/Innocuity

    [Richard]: So, first the anecdote. Early on in my six-month visit to India in 2010 the person anonymised as Respondent № 04 on The Actual Freedom Trust list – whose first post is date-stamped 09 Jan 1999 on my portion of the web site source – arranged to meet with me. Arriving after an early-hour inter-city train trip he spent around four or five hours with me and about an hour or so into the conversation he happened to mention, en passant, how he was not able to put the actualism method into practice at work as he could not be attentive to how he was experiencing this moment of being alive, each moment again, during his workaday hours as the job-description required that a large percentage of his time be spent at a computer station being attentive to the myriad manoeuvres on the computer screen virtually every moment of the day.

    Although somewhat taken aback by the implications and ramifications of such obvious ignorement/ ignoration source of my specific responses and explanations, online, it was a simple matter to point out how the moment-to-moment monitoring of the affections is, of course, an affective monitoring – along with reminding him how the identity inhabiting this flesh-and-blood body all those years ago was a family man working 12-14 hours a day for 6-7 days a week in order to feed, clothe and house everyone (mortgage commitments, hire-purchase payments, and etcetera) – and to thereafter verbalise what is freely available for perusal and edification on The Actual Freedom Trust web site. source (Richard, List D, Claudiu4, 3 February 2016). (links open in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  26. 26

    A Warning Signal (A Flashing Red Light)

    The following excerpt – from an online exchange five years previously – should demonstrate why that en passant comment of his has remained with me to the present day.
    Viz.:

    • [Respondent № 04]: [Okay, then why is it important to ascertain causation and the succession?] Does it help to see the silliness?

    • [Richard]: What is being pointed out, in the above exchange, is seeing the silliness of having such an event – whatever that event may be – take away one’s enjoyment and appreciation of being alive at this particular moment (the only moment one is ever alive) by having such an incident as that trigger off the feeling.

    The name of the game is to habituate an affective imitation of the actual each moment/ each place again – to consistently feel as happy and harmless (free of both malice and sorrow and, thus, their antidotal pacifiers love and compassion) as is humanly possible whilst remaining a ‘self’ – so as to enable the already always existing peace-on-earth to be apparent sooner rather than later ... therefore *whenever/ wherever there is the slightest diminution of that felicity/ innocuity it speaks for itself* that some event, which has been constantly granted the power such as to customarily render that peace and harmony short-lived, has been permitted, via a lifetime of continuous/ routine ignoration, to wreak its havoc once again.[emphasis added]. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 4a, 31 July 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  27. 27

    One has Inadvertently Wandered off the Way

    [Respondent]: So one’s attentiveness must always be ‘scanning’ the belly/chest/throat/face area for feelings?

    [Richard]: No, all it takes is to be aware of/ attentive to the slightest diminishment of whatever degree of felicity/innocuity one is currently experiencing.

    [Respondent]: What about when one is absorbed in the visual experience (like a mini PCE)?

    [Richard]: Again, attentiveness to any diminishment of whatever degree of felicity/ innocuity one is currently experiencing is all it takes.

    [Respondent]: At that time one’s attention would only be lightly (if at all) on any small emotional occurrences in the chest per say.

    [Richard]: With practise even the slightest diminishment of whatever degree of felicity/ innocuity one is currently experiencing is unavoidably noticed, and thus attended to forthwith, so as to recommence feeling felicitous/innocuous sooner rather than later.

    [Respondent]: Basically attentiveness (to feelings in chest) and sensuousness (to visual field, air on skin, etc.) seem to be similar yet have different ‘areas’ of focus. It seems that I can only do one well at a time, yet I get the impression that you’d say both must occur simultaneously for anything substantial to take place in my very nature. Am I correct?

    [Richard]: Nope ... all it takes is to be aware of/ attentive to the quality of the felicity/ innocuity one is currently experiencing and, with the pure intent born of naiveté, the requisite noticing of/attending to happens virtually of its own accord.

    And the key to unlocking naiveté is sincerity, pure and simple.
    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 68d, 17 October 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  28. 28

    The Actualism Method is Really Very, Very Simple

    [Respondent]: I don’t understand the AF method instructions.

    [Richard]: The actualism method is remarkably simple in practice:

    • [Richard]: ‘It is really very, very simple (which is possibly why it has never been discovered before this): one felt good previously; one is not feeling good now; something happened to one to end that felicitous feeling; one finds out what happened; one sees how silly that is (no matter what it was); one is once more feeling good’. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 71, 9 July 2004b).

    source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 79, 21 Jun 2005). (links open in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  29. 29

    How Am I Experiencing this Moment of Being Alive

    [Respondent]: I think I just don’t get the question. That is, it doesn’t make sense to me. Quote: ‘How am I experiencing this moment of being alive?’ The how has got me stumped.

    [Richard]: ‘Affectively, of course ... that is how you are experiencing this moment. Look, let us not unnecessarily complicate things here. The ‘how’ simply means ‘what feeling am I experiencing right now with’ ... which is: ‘Am I bored?’, ‘Am I resentful?’, ‘Am I at ease?’, ‘Am I glad?’, ‘Am I sad?’ and so on. You see, peace-on-earth is here right now – the perfection of the infinitude of this universe is happening at this moment – and you are missing out on it because you are feeling what it is like to be here instead of actually being here. Hence: ‘How am I experiencing this moment’ means ‘What feeling is preventing the on-going experiencing of peace-on-earth?’
    source (Richard, List B, No. 26, 14 Nov 1998). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  30. 30

    The Enjoyment and Appreciation of Being Alive Right Now

    RESPONDENT: By the way, the part of HAIETMOBA? that induced a PCE for me one day were the words ‘this moment’. They grabbed my attention, stopped me and ... presto changeo, actuality bloomed.

    RICHARD: Yes, I noticed that the first time you wrote it and it particularly caught my attention as I have had more than a few people ask why the question cannot be shortened to ‘how am I experiencing’ ... the ‘this moment of being alive’ is vital to being here – just here – right now, at this moment, as this is the only moment of being alive.

    In actuality it is, of course, never not this moment – this moment lasts forever, as it always has done and always will do, and is the arena in which all things happen – but in reality it is experienced as being but a fleeting moment as one is out of time.

    To be in time is, to use your expression, such a gas! source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 50, 11 October 2003). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  31. 31

    Caused Happiness and Unconditional/ Non-Contingent Happiness

    MARTIN: Hello Richard. Isn’t there a combination of conditional/ caused happiness and unconditional/ non-contingent happiness?
    RICHARD: G’day Martin,
    As a caused, or conditional, happiness has a beginning and an end – it is dependent upon situations and circumstances – and an uncaused, or unconditional, happiness is perpetual, aeonian (beginningless and endless) it is self-evident they are categorically distinct; as such, there obviously cannot be “a combination” of the two.
    (…)
    Put simply: doing something pleasant and/or beneficial – or something pleasurable and/or beneficent happening – is a bonus on top of the sheer delight of being alive/ being here as a flesh-and-blood body only.

    MARTIN: For example, even when one’s enjoyment and appreciation is solely to being alive/ being here, that may involve enjoyable activities that have a beginning and an end, for example eating something tasty. Shouldn’t one enjoy those activities?
    RICHARD: Where enjoyment and appreciation are due solely to being alive/ being here as a flesh-and-blood body only (neither ego-centric nor soul-centric; i.e., no self-centredness whatsoever) – which is what ensues either in a pure consciousness experience (PCE) or upon an actual freedom from the human condition – there is the added bonus of pleasurable activities and events to enjoy and appreciate (along with the distinct advantage that unpleasant activities and events do not detract one whit from that sheer enjoyment and appreciation of being alive/ being here as a flesh-and-blood body only).
    (…)
    In other words, an apperceptive awareness of an actual happiness/ felicity is not dependent upon experiencing sensate (bodily) pleasure; an apperceptive awareness of an actual happiness/ felicity occurs all the while sensate (bodily) pain is happening as well.

    MARTIN: But what exactly is the perspective in doing so that maintains an unconditional happiness as being paramount?
    RICHARD: The very fact of being alive/ being here as a flesh-and-blood body only – sans both identity in toto/the entire affective faculty – is what maintains (to use your terminology) the paramountcy of an unconditional/ uncaused happiness.
    Put differently: a non-contingent happiness – a felicity not dependent upon either the situation or the circumstances – is the default condition of the very fact of being alive/ being here as a flesh-and-blood body only (i.e., sans both the instinctual passions and the feeling-being formed thereof).
    There is a lengthy email exchange on my portion of The Actual Freedom Trust web site, starting on May 11 2006, which goes into this ‘happiness is the default condition’ topic in extensive detail. It all began when I reported that happiness is inherent to perfection. Viz.:

    • [Respondent № 110]: The universe is not predisposed to good or bad ...
    • [Richard]: Indeed not ... what the universe is predisposed to (to use your phraseology) is perfection.
    • [Respondent № 110]: ... there’s no reason to expect life to be happy.
    • [Richard]: Happiness is not a product of good or bad ... it is inherent to perfection. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 110, 11 May 2006).

    As the resultant email exchange extends over 16-17 posts, all told, it will take a while to follow it all the way through.
    (...)
    (As a virtual freedom involves remaining as happy and as harmless (as free from sorrow and malice) as is humanly possible, come-what-may, it is thus not dependent upon the situation and the circumstances. In that sense, then, the virtually sorrow-free felicity of a virtual freedom can also qualify as an unconditional happiness but as it is neither permanent nor totally sorrow-free it is relatively, and not absolutely, unconditional). source (Richard, List D, Martin, 2 August 2016). (links open in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  32. 32

    A Conditional Happiness

    JONATHAN: So the meditation practices blow the affectionate and desirable emotions and passions up larger than life?
    RICHARD: That is one way of putting it ... the spiritualisation process involved is essentially one of sublimation and transcendence.

    JONATHAN: What do they do with the felicitous ones?
    RICHARD: As a generalisation: the felicitous (and innocuous) feelings are not experienced in their own right but are subsumed under the ‘good’ feelings ... felicity (and innocuity), rather than being the delightful experience of sensuosity and sensuality, then comes from feeling loving and compassionate (for instance).

    A conditional happiness, in other words, dependent upon the ascendancy of the ‘good’ feelings. [Emphasis added]. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, Jonathan, 5 Jan 2016). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  33. 33

    Actualism’s Awareness

    For an actually free person such awareness is, of course, an apperceptive awareness. Viz:

    • [Richard]: An apperceptive awareness of the nuances in the way or manner in which this flesh and blood body operates and functions – which the awareness of the actualism method seeks to imitate – whilst interacting with fellow human beings is more than sufficient to conclude what the striking event was a consequence of. [emphasis added].
    source (Richard, Mailing List D, No. 2, 6 Jan 2010). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text
  34. 34

    Be Totally Sincere

    RESPONDENT: The result is that fear still comes, stays as long as it pleases, then departs until next time. Then it comes, stays as long as it pleases, then departs until next time. So on. So forth. As it was in the beginning, is now, and ever shall be. World without end, hallelujah.
    RICHARD: If I might suggest? Try looking-up the word ‘sincere’ in a good dictionary or two ... and I only suggest this as sincerity is the key to unlocking naiveté (without which one might as well stand on one’s head in a corner and whistle pop-goes-the-weasel for all the good dabbling with the actualism method will do). (...)

    RICHARD: And here is a clue to make things go tickety-tick: naiveté, being guaranteed to reawaken a child-like sensuosity, means one walks about in a state of wide-eyed wonder, simply marvelling at being just here right now.

    And all the while leaving intellectualisation to the avidly-grazing intellectuals. source (Richard, Actual Freedom List, No. 84, 27 April 2005). (opens in new window).

    ↩ back to text